binding state backup

David W. Hankins David_Hankins at isc.org
Tue Dec 11 23:48:11 UTC 2007


On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 04:03:32PM -0600, Stephen.Mattox at ins.com wrote:
> After breaking a primary failover relationship and setting the primary
> to be a standalone for all pools, the lease file is keeping many leases
> in a "binding state backup". Is this expected? Or will this cause
> issues? Testing indicates the server, even though it no longer has a
> failover peer, will not use these leases.

yeah, we never wrote a code path to downgrade from failover.  if you
want to run without failover, you'll have to sed the backup states to
free.

-- 
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil?	 https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		     you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins


More information about the dhcp-users mailing list