binding state backup
David W. Hankins
David_Hankins at isc.org
Tue Dec 11 23:48:11 UTC 2007
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 04:03:32PM -0600, Stephen.Mattox at ins.com wrote:
> After breaking a primary failover relationship and setting the primary
> to be a standalone for all pools, the lease file is keeping many leases
> in a "binding state backup". Is this expected? Or will this cause
> issues? Testing indicates the server, even though it no longer has a
> failover peer, will not use these leases.
yeah, we never wrote a code path to downgrade from failover. if you
want to run without failover, you'll have to sed the backup states to
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
More information about the dhcp-users