failover vs. load-balancing?
atxnomad at gmail.com
Tue Dec 18 02:52:43 UTC 2007
We're planning on moving to a new version of the ISC dhcp server (3.1.0) and
have considered implementing either failover or load-balancing. I've done
some reading and while I have an idea of the differences between the two, I
have no experience running them in production. Right now we have one dhcp
server with a second holding copies of all configs and leases. Why might I
choose failover over load-balancing or balancing vs. failover? Seems that
with a beefy enough box, I could run a simpler setup with just using
Thoughts? Suggestions? Recommendations?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dhcp-users