David W. Hankins
David_Hankins at isc.org
Wed May 30 16:43:49 UTC 2007
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:12:40PM -0700, Ian Anderson wrote:
> Does this include the "Safe period" feature as well?
No. I would say that's a documented optional feature of the
draft - the work in 3.1.x was an attempt to sync up to a myriad
of changes made to the draft since revision 7 (not the least of
which was renumbering all the protocol messages).
Basically with the 3.1.x work behind us, we can work on that
kind of stuff now I think.
I'd like to get the "lease state rewind" optimization feature
in first, before a safe period. I think for most people, the
lease state rewind would do what they need, and it's safer.
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
More information about the dhcp-users