'MAC affinity' doing the exact opposite, leading to 'pool churn'?

David W. Hankins David_Hankins at isc.org
Tue Sep 25 19:20:31 UTC 2007

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 08:42:44PM +0200, Bart Van den Broeck wrote:
> before, the tests where performed on a "fresh install".)  It seems 'client
> affinity' is indeed causing the problem.  (BTW, isn't 'client affinity' a
> better name than 'MAC address affinity'?)


> 18:00:47 s1 dhcpd: DHCPACK on to 00:0f:1f:84:ca:f2 via eth1
> 18:03:48 s1 dhcpd: failover: lease given to secondary for client affinity on ack

this is on expiry?

that's a really short lease...

Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil?	 https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		     you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins

More information about the dhcp-users mailing list