Trying to grasp RFC 3011, using ISC DHCP and Cisco ASA
David W. Hankins
David_Hankins at isc.org
Thu Dec 11 17:24:08 UTC 2008
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:17:02AM -0800, Nick Ellson wrote:
> Do you see this as something the VPN system is not performing properly in the request then? (I have an open case with Cisco that I am working as well)
Well, if you intend to use either option 118 or option 82 sub 5, then
those need to be supplied. If they aren't, we can't synthesize them.
If giaddr is enough to locate the right subnet(s), that's fine too.
But that segues into the current problem; your giaddr is apparently
an invalid value, not the address locating the DHCP relay agent.
Ash bugud-gul durbatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul.
Why settle for the lesser evil? https://secure.isc.org/store/t-shirt/
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the dhcp-users