DHCP Server on an Wireless Bridge
Vincent Arniego
vincent_arniego at yahoo.com
Wed Feb 6 09:59:21 UTC 2008
>[va]
This
is
the
equipment,
it
can
be
a
bridge
or
an
access
point.
><http://motorola.canopywireless.com/products/advantage/>http://motorola.canopywireless.com/products/advantage/
Interesting
>
>Have
you
contacted
the
vendor
to
see
if
this
"feature"
can
be
turned
>
>off
and
the
device
made
into
a
real
bridge
?
>[va]
Actually,
we
asked
the
vendor
to
make
this
as
it
is
a
translated
bridge.
>We
are
currently
serving
around
300K
subs
as
of
today,
and
not
>making
it
translated
will
be
>an
inventory
nightmare.
Somehow
by
translating
the
layer
2
mac
of
>the
device,
we
are
able
to
determine
which
antennas
are
still
>active.
Oh
yeah,
why
not
use
the
uniqueness
of
the
PC
mac?
Because
>its
not
unique.
>There
are
NIC's
that
somehow
have
the
same
MAC.
And
that's
the
same
>reason,
why
I
would
like
to
use
the
bridge's
MAC
as
DHCP
lease
basis.
May
I
suggest
you
have
your
priorities
the
wrong
way
round
?
It
sounds
like
you
are
deliberately
breaking
stuff
and
then
complaining
when
other
stuff
doesn't
work
!
[va] I'm not complaining that DHCP doesn't work. I know that DHCP just reads the CHADDR instead of the mac in the ethernet header. I'm just asking if there's some other way to get that MAC and do something with DHCP to do that. And I think that's already answered -- NO.
Duplicate
MACs
-
yes
it
happens
(rarely),
so
track
down
the
subscriber(s)
and
have
them
fix
their
kit.
Not
sure
who
they
are
(you
SHOULD
know)
then
just
block
that
MAC
and
wait
till
they
ring
you
!
[va] they would ring, but I dont want to hear a 'ringer' at the end.
I do hope you read about stupid customers at some tech support jokes site,
there are subs here that are worst than that. Most subs here just want their connection fixed, without them doing anything. But rest assured there are separate efforts to curb that problem -- not my own effort.
Oh yeah, I have to disagree with the rarely happening duplicate MACs, we have a single mac with over 200 subs having it.
And
as
for
monitoring
base
station
usage
-
try
management
tools.
I'd
be
REALLY
surprised
if
these
units
don't
have
some
very
useful
values
available
by
SNMP,
I'd
be
even
more
surprised
if
one
of
these
didn't
allow
you
to
monitor
number
of
users.
In
a
situation
like
that,
I'd
be
looking
to
collect
and
store
that
information
as
part
of
the
management
process
(look
at
graph,
see
number
of
subscribers
going
up,
alert
management
that
a
base
is
heading
for
overload
-
for
example).
[va] yeah we have snmp but just trust me that its very very challenging task to monitor the subs when the MAC is not translated.
>Can
you
put
a
relay
device
behind
the
bridge
and
use
that
to
forward
>the
dhcp
requests?
For
example,
using
a
router
or
a
computer
running
>dhcrelay?
Can
the
"bridge"
function
as
a
dhcp
relay?
Can
you
tell
us
>what
vendor/model
the
"bridge"
is?
>
>[va]
Motorola
Canopy,
option
82
is
not
yet
built
in,
but
we
might
>ask
them
to
include
it.
That
wasn't
the
question
!
But
now
we
see
what
the
bridge
is
doing,
we
can
see
that
the
answer
is
no.
[va] Hopefully its not. I do hope they do have some kind.
OK,
supplementary
question
-
how
do
you
identify
subscribers
?
As
in,
how
do
you
admit
only
those
people
that
are
paying
you
for
(or
are
authorised
to
use)
the
service
?
[va] We developed an in-house system. So far so good, except on that duplicate mac though.
[va] Anyhow I think I got my answer already. Thanks everyone.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20080206/0e84b4f9/attachment.html>
More information about the dhcp-users
mailing list