Source Tar Ball Installation

T MANIKANDAN-PKXR74 manikandan.t at motorola.com
Thu Mar 5 06:29:56 UTC 2009


Using Dhcperf tool from Nominum

Regards
Mani 

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Tom Schmitt
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:16 PM
To: Users of ISC DHCP
Subject: Re: RE: Source Tar Ball Installation

Hi,

one questions to your numbers:

How (using what tool) do you measure the number of handshakes per second?

Tom.



-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:12:11 +0800
> Von: "T MANIKANDAN-PKXR74" <manikandan.t at motorola.com>
> An: "Users of ISC DHCP" <dhcp-users at lists.isc.org>
> Betreff: RE: Source Tar Ball Installation

> Hi ,
>  
>    To conclude this mail Chain, we have done the testing based on the 
> recommendation we received from experts.
>  
> 1. To increase the Capacity performance of DHCP server
>      
>        disabling Ping-check, and writing the leases to ram disk 
> increase the capacity approximately 25X (25 Times the normal 
> Performance) , By dividing the 10.0/8 into various pools with max of 
> 251 per pool you can achieve the 25 X capacity  performance.
>  
>  
> 2. To increase the Performance of service startup time
>  
>       Increase the Hash table size for LEASE_HASH_SIZE  in 
> /includes/dhcpd.h
>  
>   Incase any of my understandings is to be changed or reviewed please 
> mention your comments.
>  
>  
> Regards
> Mani
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: T MANIKANDAN-PKXR74
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 10:05 AM
> To: 'Users of ISC DHCP'
> Subject: RE: Source Tar Ball Installation
> 
> 
> Hi,
>  
>    The LEASE_HASH_SIZE parameter really improves the service startup 
> time for my 10.0/8 network from 20 minutes to some seconds but I 
> didn't see any improvement in the 5 way handshakes performance, this 
> is my observation.
>  
>     and by implementing ping-check off and writing the leases to a ram 
> disk instead of Hard disk betters the performance for 10.0/24 subnet 
> around 2300 5 way handshakes per second and for 10.0/8 the performance 
> remains the same around 92 five way handshakes per second.
>  
>   Is there a way to increase the performance when the subnet is 10.0/8 
> why the performance is degrading ?? any help is appreciated.
>  
> Thanks & Regards
> Mani
> 
>>  

--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01
_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users



More information about the dhcp-users mailing list