DHCPv6 failover protocol?

Ted Lemon Ted.Lemon at nominum.com
Fri Mar 6 01:30:01 UTC 2009

On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:28 PM, David W. Hankins wrote:
> It's also quite possible we will have something very different; a
> stateless server algorithm so that (n+1) servers can answer
> consistently without needing to update each other.

You mean DHCPv6 load balancing?   Yes, that seems more likely.    
Because IPv6 has address deprecation, the need for failover is  
unlikely to ever justify the work involved in implementing it.

More information about the dhcp-users mailing list