DHCPv6 failover protocol?

[John Jason Brzozowski]

For what it is worth, I contemplated (and hope to some day soon  
complete) writing an information draft that outlines some deployment  
considerations specific to this topic.

John
===============================================
John Jason Brzozowski
jjmb at jjmb.com
(p) 484-994-6787
(f) 610-616-4535
===============================================

On Mar 7, 2009, at 12:04 PM, John Jason Brzozowski wrote:

> We will likely need some protocol for DHCPv6 redundancy particularly  
> when DHCPv6 is used for IPv6 PD (RFC3633).  This use case is not so  
> different that what we have today with IPv4.
>
> John
> ===============================================
> John Jason Brzozowski
> jjmb at jjmb.com
> (p) 484-994-6787
> (f) 610-616-4535
> ===============================================
>
> On Mar 5, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
>> On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:28 PM, David W. Hankins wrote:
>>> It's also quite possible we will have something very different; a
>>> stateless server algorithm so that (n+1) servers can answer
>>> consistently without needing to update each other.
>>
>> You mean DHCPv6 load balancing?   Yes, that seems more likely.    
>> Because IPv6 has address deprecation, the need for failover is  
>> unlikely to ever justify the work involved in implementing it.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcp-users mailing list
>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>