Failover on a large DHCP system
David W. Hankins
David_Hankins at isc.org
Fri May 8 16:41:35 UTC 2009
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:09:29AM -0600, Nicholas F Miller wrote:
> With constant restarts of DHCP and the need for
> failover to redistribute the pools on restarts I think the server load and
> disk access would be too high.
The disk access footprint between failover restarts is only the
"changes" to the database. It doesn't remirror the lease db every
reconnect - they only update each other with any new bindings that
ocurred during the blackout.
With huge numbers of leases, it can be a problem however, as it causes
both servers to traverse the entire lease database (in memory) right
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the dhcp-users