wieland at purdue.edu
Fri Oct 9 11:23:35 UTC 2009
Ray Phillips wrote:
>> What I do is to *never* use an "option subnet-mask" statement, and
>> just let the subnet statement handle it, *unless* you have a subnet
>> that needs a different mask, and then (and only then) I assign it with
>> "option subnet-mask".
> What's an example of a situation where a client would need to be given a
> subnet mask different from the one specified on the subnet line?
> I wonder if the broadcast-address option has to be supplied, since it
> can be inferred from the subnet and netmask values?
I've seen setting the netmask to a different value done to attempt
to limit the broadcast traffic for devices that were behind a NAT
device, and that only needed to communicate with that NAT device.
I don't know how successful that was.
Jeff Wieland | Purdue University
Network Systems Administrator | ITN&S Data Networks
Voice: (765)496-8234 | 501 Harrison Street
FAX: (765)494-6620 | West Lafayette, IN 47907-2025
More information about the dhcp-users