David W. Hankins
dhankins at isc.org
Tue Apr 13 21:18:28 UTC 2010
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:32:34PM +1000, Glenn Satchell wrote:
> The theory was that any logic required to determine if the partner was
> truly down was all external to dhcpd and often very specific to the site.
> As there is an existing way to remotely control dhcpd using omshell, the
> idea was to leave the determination to the site admin.
> The auto-partner-feature in version 4.2.0 is probably does what you want.
> Maybe download the source and have a look at the new documentation.
Spot on Glenn.
Note that in 4.2.0a2 I also included an optimization that permits the
servers to "rewind" leases to the state most recently negotiated with
the peer. This alone may be enough for geographic-diversity types of
server pairings, and you wouldn't want to use auto-partner-down in
such situations because of the risk of addressing conflicts.
auto-partner-down is mainly intended to help operators of "HA",
heartbeat-cable type deployments find failover a more comfortable
interim tool (where disconnection really does mean they are down).
David W. Hankins BIND 10 needs more DHCP voices.
Software Engineer There just aren't enough in our heads.
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. http://bind10.isc.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the dhcp-users