Class matching

[Sten Carlsen]

 Just a silly question:
When you tried to put the servers in the pools, did you remove the
classes? If you didn't, there is still multiple places from where to get
the info.

If tftp server option is in pools, don't put them anywhere else.

On 03/10/10 14:20, Glenn Satchell wrote:
> On 10/03/10 20:16, Luka wrote:
>> I'm sorry for sending this message as a new one and not as a reply, but
>> I haven't received your replies and had to find them in the archives.
>>
>> Glenn Satchell:
>>
>> Possible workarounds include defining the option tftp-server-name in the
>> pool, rather than the class. This may not be suitable if you have many
>> pools.
>>
>> Can you distinguish the two groups of machines any other way? Do you
>> need two different tftp servers because the download file is different?
>> ---
>>
>> Yes, there are many pools declared and I have tried to put the tftp
>> option inside the pool with:
>>
>> if( option vendor-class-identifier = "some-vendor" ) {
>>     option tftp-server-name = "10.0.0.2";
>> }
>>
>> but the clients still get the tftp from the a class.
>>
>
> Hmm, what about using groups, something like this?
>
> class "spa" {
>     match if (substring(hardware,1,3) = 00:01:02);
> }
>
> Subnets are declared as such:
>
> # clients that need 10.0.0.1
> group {
>   option tftp-server-name "10.0.0.1";
>   subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>     option routers 192.168.1.1;
>     option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
>     option broadcast-address 192.168.1.255;
>     pool {
>         allow members of "spa";
>         range 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.254;
>     }
>   }
>   subnet ... {
>   }
> }
> # clients that need 10.0.0.2
> group {
>   option tftp-server-name "10.0.0.2";
>   subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>     option routers 192.168.2.1;
>     option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
>     option broadcast-address 192.168.2.255;
>     pool {
>         allow members of "spa";
>         range 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.254;
>     }
>   subnet ... {
>   }
> }
>
> # or without grouping - use the same class definition above, but note
> # there is no tftp-server defined in the class, only in the pool:
> subnet 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>     option routers 192.168.2.1;
>     option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
>     option broadcast-address 192.168.2.255;
>     pool {
>         allow members of "spa";
>         range 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.254;
>         option tftp-server-name "10.0.0.2";
>   }
> }
>
> regards,
> -glenn
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users

-- 
Best regards

Sten Carlsen

No improvements come from shouting:

       "MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!" 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20101003/941b5f1f/attachment.html>