Problem with class definition

[Simon Hobson]

??????????? ?????????? wrote:
>yes, I have multiple small pools in bit subnet...

Then is it not correct to write :

subnet 94.137.191.0 netmask 255.255.255.192
{
     option routers 94.137.191.1;
     option subnet-mask 255.255.255.192;
     pool {
         range 94.137.191.2 94.137.191.5;
     }

subnet 94.137.191.64 netmask 255.255.255.192
{
     option routers 94.137.191.65;
     option subnet-mask 255.255.255.192;
     pool {
         range 94.137.191.66 94.137.191.70;
     }
}

If this is in fact how the network is set up, then this is how you 
should define it, and address assignment will work automagically. 
 From your earlier message :

>Solution was to identify clients by source address from where 
>request comes. (actually from ip assigned to that vlan on cisco 
>switch, vlan gateway)

It certainly sound like that is the case.
-- 
Simon Hobson

Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed
author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as
Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books.