MAC address change

Glenn Satchell glenn.satchell at uniq.com.au
Sat Nov 26 06:40:33 UTC 2011


On 11/26/11 09:51, Jan Markus wrote:
> Dne 11/25/2011 11:17 PM, Sten Carlsen napsal(a):
>> Hmm?
>>
>> fixed-address 1.1.1.2;
>> subnet 1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.252 {
>> option routers 1.1.1.1;
>> }
>>
>> As far as I can see that fixed address IS contained in the subnet? and
>> the subnet is part of the shared network?
>>
>> On 25/11/11 19:58, Simon Hobson wrote:
>>> Sten Carlsen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> host customer101public {
>>>>> hardware ethernet 00:11:22:33:44:55;
>>>>> fixed-address 1.1.1.2;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> shared-network vlan101 {
>>>>> subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.248 {
>>>>> option routers 10.0.0.1;
>>>>> pool {
>>>>> range 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.6;
>>>>> deny known-clients;
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> subnet 1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.252 {
>>>>> option routers 1.1.1.1;
>>>>> }
>>>>> }
>>>
>>>> You still have the mistake to have a fixed address in a range.
>>>> Declare subnet 1.1.1.0 with no range statement. There is a risk that
>>>> an unknown client will be given the 1.1.1.2 address when it is
>>>> defined as a range.
>>>
>>> Err, no he hasn't. The range is in a different (RFC1918) subnet).
>>
>
> well, I don't know what you guys know, but I've been playing with this
> configuration for a half a day, and it just plain works
>
> but thanks for your interest anyway
>
> -jan

I can't see it any more either. The last posted config looks just fine 
and correct.

There was an earlier one that had a range statement iin the 1.1.1.0 
subnet, but you've fixed that. Looks like they're arguing over the 
earlier config perhaps?

regards,
-glenn



More information about the dhcp-users mailing list