best version for new failover setup?
pkeck at uga.edu
Wed Sep 7 20:14:06 UTC 2011
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:45:48PM +0200, Jiri Popelka wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 10:35 PM, Paul Keck wrote:
> >What is the recommended version for a new failover setup? We tend to like
> >to be off the leading edge on this kind of stuff around here; stability
> >trumps new features and being up-to-the-minute. Any reason to STOP using
> >isc-dhcpd-V3.0.5-RedHat ? That's what I'm running now. Any failover bugs
> >back in the 3's?
> I've seen several 'strange failover problems' reports with 3.0.5
> (RHEL-5) but none with 4.1.1 (RHEL-6) so far.
> For those who still want to stick with RHEL-5 but use 4.1.1 instead
> of 3.0.5 I wrote small HOWTO.
Thanks Jiri! I'll look at this route. The sysadmins don't want to go with
rhel6 quite yet.
I notice that your source RPM is for 4.1.1-24.P1 from 2010 where the current
4.1 stable is 4.1-ESV-R3. There look to be some good bug fixes in
4.1-ESV-R3. Any tips on getting your changes into the 4.1-ESV-R3 for easier
Paul Keck pkeck at uga.edu
University of Georgia
EITS Network Operations mailto:pkeck at ediacara.org
--Opinions mine.-- Go fighting anomalocaridids!!!
More information about the dhcp-users