Issue with dhcpd6 and range6

[perl-list]

I don't believe that is a valid network... but I could be wrong :) It seems to me that in a /120 only the last nibble would be non-significant so that: 

fe80::a02:200/120 
fe80::a02:2000 -> fe80::a02:200f 

would be the valid range6. Again tho - could be wrong ... 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "David Highley" <dhighley at highley-recommended.com>
> To: dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 12:33:52 PM
> Subject: Issue with dhcpd6 and range6

> This is the first effort to set up an IPV6 network. Trying to
> implement
> the equivalent of a 10.2.2.0 network. Name services work both forward
> and reverse and static dhcp addresses are not complained about. Just
> do
> not seem to be able to get the dynamic addresses to work.

> subnet6 fe80::a02:200/120 {
> range6 fe80::a02:241 fe80::a02:254;

> Get the following messages:
> dhcpd: mark_hosts_unavailable: host address is not 128 bits.

> Another general question is we have not located a list of valid
> options
> for dhcpd6. We do see the man page has information but sometimes it
> is
> easier to just see a list. This is being set up on a Fedora 16 system
> using dhcp 4.2.3-6.P2.
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20120219/4cc7ee5c/attachment.html>