sending options from wrong subnet in shared-network
Brian J. Murrell
brian at interlinx.bc.ca
Thu Dec 5 15:50:28 UTC 2013
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 10:31 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 16:09 +0100, Sten Carlsen wrote:
> > If they are not,
> > inheritance will come from that subnet as well, overriding the options
> > in the subnet where the address eventually comes from.
> Well, if that's a way to force the options from the proper subnet, then
> maybe that's my solution, despite this seeming wrong.
So, yeah. Moving the host declarations up into the subnet declaration
forced dhcpd to send the right options.
I still think this feels wrong though and a hack against what appears to
be a dhcpd bug. Not that I'm convinced that it's not a configuration
error. I just have a difficult time imagining any configuration that
should result in getting an ip address from one subnet and the options
from another in a shared-network configuration.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the dhcp-users