MAC vs DUID issue
ted.lemon at nominum.com
Wed Apr 2 19:44:17 UTC 2014
On Apr 2, 2014, at 3:37 PM, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> There's been some spirited discussion about this on Nanog recently,
> see for instance
Douglas Owen's response was correct. The choice of wording in 3315 with respect to opaqueness was unfortunate—the intended goal of that text was to require that DHCP servers consider the _whole_ DUID as the unique identifier, not just the link-layer portion, but it wasn't intended that the link-layer portion couldn't be used for other reasons.
More information about the dhcp-users