Log messages

[Keith]

As an extra bit of info.

I just realized that this log message only appears when an INFORM comes in from
the option 82
enabled networks:

Jan 17 06:00:20 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
there is no lease associated with this client.
Jan 17 06:00:20 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.182.54 via 69.176.182.1
--
Jan 17 06:01:03 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
there is no lease associated with this client.
Jan 17 06:01:03 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.184.249 via 69.176.184.1
--
Jan 17 06:01:07 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
there is no lease associated with this client.
Jan 17 06:01:07 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.183.198 via 69.176.183.1
--
Jan 17 06:01:21 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
there is no lease associated with this client.
Jan 17 06:01:21 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.182.54 via 69.176.182.1
--
Jan 17 06:02:24 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
there is no lease associated with this client.
Jan 17 06:02:24 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.182.54 via 69.176.182.1
--
Jan 17 06:03:26 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
there is no lease associated with this client.
Jan 17 06:03:26 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.182.54 via 69.176.182.1
--
Jan 17 06:03:58 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
there is no lease associated with this client.
Jan 17 06:03:58 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.184.94 via 69.176.184.1

I'm guessing its harmless, but would like to know if there is something I can do
to make it go away?

-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org [mailto:dhcp-users-
-> bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Keith
-> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:30 AM
-> To: dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
-> Subject: Log messages
-> 
-> We recently started using Option 82 on our dslams.
-> 
-> I first turned it on for a few of them the first week of Jan.
-> 
-> Using this in the subnet declaration:
-> 
-> if exists agent.circuit-id {
->         log ( error, concat( "Lease for ", binary-to-ascii (10, 8, ".",
leased-address), "
-> is connected to ", option agent.circuit-id));
->         }
-> 
-> will generate this line in Dhcpd.log:
-> 
-> Lease for 69.176.181.162 is connected to
-> Shelf-14-30:1/1:0.35:VLAN=1:ifIndex=1003001
-> 
-> Something I did not notice for some reason until today is a log line that is
-> appearing:
-> 
-> dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive: there is no lease
-> associated with this client
-> 
-> I can't tell where its coming from.
-> 
-> DHCPDISCOVER from 00:16:b6:80:b5:13 (tc-e4f6ed2f5b87) via 69.176.179.1 Jan 21
-> 09:18:20 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 69.176.179.166 to 00:16:b6:80:b5:13 via
-> 69.176.179.1 Jan 21 09:18:20 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 69.176.179.166
-> (209.145.111.37) from 00:16:b6:80:b5:13 via 69.176.179.1 Jan 21 09:18:20
netreg1
-> dhcpd: DHCPACK on 69.176.179.166 to 00:16:b6:80:b5:13 via 69.176.179.1 Jan 21
-> 09:18:33 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
-> there is no lease associated with this client.
-> Jan 21 09:18:33 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.180.150 via
-> 69.176.180.1 Jan 21 09:18:33 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPACK to 69.176.180.150
-> (e0:69:95:77:5c:98) via
-> bce0
-> Jan 21 09:18:42 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 44:6d:57:56:3f:4f (Gerry-
-> HP) via 69.176.178.1 Jan 21 09:18:43 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on
69.176.178.90
-> to 44:6d:57:56:3f:4f
-> (Gerry-HP) via 69.176.178.1
-> 
-> A little snip of the log file, is this being generated from the
69.176.180.150 lease
-> or the 69.176.179.166 lease?
-> 
-> The 69.176.180.0 network has option 82 enabled, but the 69.176.179 network
-> does not. And looking how the option 82 info comes through this appears to be
-> from the 69.176.180 network.
-> 
-> The "leased-address" log entry has me wondering. It didn't appear before
-> enabling option 82 as I went back in my logs looking.
-> 
-> There is a leased address for both IP addresses in Dhcpd.leases.
-> 
-> As far as I can tell dhcp is working ok. Where is this log entry coming from
and is
-> this something to be concerned about?
-> 
-> Thanks,
-> Keith
-> 
-> _______________________________________________
-> dhcp-users mailing list
-> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
-> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users