Log messages

[Bill Shirley]

Wrap the log message:
on commit {
     log ...
  }

Bill

On 1/21/2015 12:30 PM, Keith wrote:
> We recently started using Option 82 on our dslams.
>
> I first turned it on for a few of them the first week of Jan.
>
> Using this in the subnet declaration:
>
> if exists agent.circuit-id {
>          log ( error, concat( "Lease for ", binary-to-ascii (10, 8, ".",
> leased-address), " is connected to ", option agent.circuit-id));
>          }
>
> will generate this line in Dhcpd.log:
>
> Lease for 69.176.181.162 is connected to
> Shelf-14-30:1/1:0.35:VLAN=1:ifIndex=1003001
>
> Something I did not notice for some reason until today is a log line that is
> appearing:
>
> dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive: there is no lease
> associated with this client
>
> I can't tell where its coming from.
>
> DHCPDISCOVER from 00:16:b6:80:b5:13 (tc-e4f6ed2f5b87) via 69.176.179.1
> Jan 21 09:18:20 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 69.176.179.166 to 00:16:b6:80:b5:13
> via 69.176.179.1
> Jan 21 09:18:20 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 69.176.179.166 (209.145.111.37)
> from 00:16:b6:80:b5:13 via 69.176.179.1
> Jan 21 09:18:20 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 69.176.179.166 to 00:16:b6:80:b5:13
> via 69.176.179.1
> Jan 21 09:18:33 netreg1 dhcpd: data: "leased-address" configuration directive:
> there is no lease associated with this client.
> Jan 21 09:18:33 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPINFORM from 69.176.180.150 via 69.176.180.1
> Jan 21 09:18:33 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPACK to 69.176.180.150 (e0:69:95:77:5c:98) via
> bce0
> Jan 21 09:18:42 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 44:6d:57:56:3f:4f (Gerry-HP)
> via 69.176.178.1
> Jan 21 09:18:43 netreg1 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 69.176.178.90 to 44:6d:57:56:3f:4f
> (Gerry-HP) via 69.176.178.1
>
> A little snip of the log file, is this being generated from the 69.176.180.150
> lease or the 69.176.179.166 lease?
>
> The 69.176.180.0 network has option 82 enabled, but the 69.176.179 network does
> not. And looking how the option 82
> info comes through this appears to be from the 69.176.180 network.
>
> The "leased-address" log entry has me wondering. It didn't appear before
> enabling option 82 as I went back in my logs
> looking.
>
> There is a leased address for both IP addresses in Dhcpd.leases.
>
> As far as I can tell dhcp is working ok. Where is this log entry coming from and
> is this something to be concerned about?
>
> Thanks,
> Keith
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users