problem with both-faiover-server updating the DNS
fmgre-liste01 at yahoo.fr
Mon Sep 7 08:49:06 UTC 2015
both servers answer to the DHCPREQUEST offering the same IP address.
I have a few fixed-address records, but their DNS is done manually. i do not have the update-static-leases option specified
The problem is encountered on 'some' addresses ... still trying to figure out which ones
During the weekend i upgraded to the 4.3.2 but i think i still observe weird behaviour
Le Vendredi 4 septembre 2015 20h00, John Miller <johnmill at brandeis.edu> a écrit :
Both dhcp servers answering is standard procedure. Are both offering
the same IP address, however? That's not standard procedure.
Are you doing dns updates for hosts with fixed-address directives, by
any chance? (update-static-leases on)
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:23 PM, gnafou <fmgre-liste01 at yahoo.fr> wrote:
> I currently have isc dhcp servers working with failover and dns update (
> interim style )
> When upgrading my debian machine from wheezy to jessie, it upgraded as well
> dhcpd from 4.2.2 to 4.3.1.
> Since i have upgraded, i find some weird behaviour with the DNS-Update :
> for some of the machines, both dhcp servers answer, then they both update
> the DNS.
> I do not have any log lines stating ' lease owned by peer'
> And after the lease is over, one of the dhcp server deletes the dns map
> though the machine is currently being served by the other server.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dhcp-users