Option 82 based static allocations mixed with dynamic allocations

Eugene Grosbein eugen at grosbein.net
Wed Jun 8 02:46:10 UTC 2016

08.06.2016 3:44, Jason Lixfeld wrote:

> My hope is that the solution can be much simpler and more elegant
>  than having to add a 'ignore (or deny) members of CustomerOnPortX/X’
>  for each of those customer classes to the pool that allows members of “rgw01.lab”.

I've tried to solve exacly this problem myself some time ago and found there is no another way.

More information about the dhcp-users mailing list