DHCP server behing Cisco relay

[Hernan Saltiel]

Thanks a lot!
I tried that configuration, and now it's working like a charm!
Best regards,

HeCSa.

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Patrick Trapp <ptrapp at nex-tech.com> wrote:

> Also, if you are intending for addresses to be made available from both of
> the subnets, I believe you may need to define those pools as a shared
> network. Look up shared-network in your handy DHCP documentation, but I
> would wonder if something like this would make a difference:
>
> default lease-time 600;
> max-lease-time 7200;
>
> shared-network Combined-pools {
> subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 {
>   range 10.0.0.10 10.0.200.200;
>   option subnet-mask 255.255.0.0;
>   option routers 10.0.0.1;
>
> option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4;
> }
>
> subnet 192.168.120.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> }
>
> }
>
> Or, so be more generic
>
> shared-network shared-network-label
> {
> subnet1 x.x.x.x netmask 255.x.x.x
> {
> } (to close subnet1)
> subnet2 y.y.y.y netmask 255.y.y.y
> {
> } (to close subnet2)
> } (to close the shared-network declaration)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org [dhcp-users-bounces at lists.isc.org]
> on behalf of José Queiroz [zekkerj at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, May 20, 2016 4:46 PM
> *To:* Users of ISC DHCP
> *Subject:* Re: DHCP server behing Cisco relay
>
> Hi Hernan,
>
> Could you please post the Cisco Switch's relevant configuration, also?
> Including the VLAN interfaces serving the 10.0.0.0/16 network.
>
> By the way, does this switch have conectivity with your dhcp server? This
> is mandatory for the DHCP relay to work, as the relay agent needs to
> forward DHCP messages for clients in unicast to the DHCP server; and the
> reverse path must be available also, once you're checking the direct path,
> give some time checking this also.
>
>
> 2016-05-20 17:58 GMT-03:00 Hernan Saltiel <hsaltiel at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi everybody.
>>
>> Maybe I'm asking something previously answered.
>> I configured my new iscp-dhcp-server (Ubuntu 16.04) to server requests
>> from a network of APs.
>> Those APs are connected to a Cisco switch, having 192.168.120.1/24 as
>> primary address, and a secondary subnet with address 10.0.0.1/16 (yes,
>> 16...). It has relay configured, just to send the dhcp requests to
>> 192.168.120.20, a Windows machine.
>> Today I have a Windows machine connected there, where I use the AP
>> controller software, and TFTPD64, a thin software that works as a DHCP
>> server. I configured there a range (10.0.0.10 -> 10.0.200.200) and
>> everything works well, but it's Windows, then from time to time, I have to
>> reboot the system.
>> This is why I configured the new machine as 192.168.120.40/24, installed
>> isc-dhcp-server package, and configured the following lines on
>> /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf:
>>
>> default lease-time 600;
>> max-lease-time 7200;
>>
>> subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 {
>>   range 10.0.0.10 10.0.200.200;
>>   option subnet-mask 255.255.0.0;
>>   option routers 10.0.0.1;
>>   option domain-name-servers 8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4;
>> }
>>
>> subnet 192.168.120.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>> }
>>
>> When I start the server, I only see it trying to answer requests using
>> network 192.168.120.0, then saying "no free leases", and not serving any
>> 10.0.0.0/16 address.
>>
>> Now I'm living with TFTPD64, but I plan to move that to a better solution.
>> Does anybody know about this configuration? Is there something I'm doing
>> wrong?
>> Thanks a lot in advance, and best regards.
>>
>> --
>> HeCSa
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcp-users mailing list
>> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users
>



-- 
HeCSa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/attachments/20160520/7d216fea/attachment-0001.html>