Secondary in failover pair does not perform dynamic DNS updates
matthew.kassawara at blinker.com
Tue Apr 4 18:29:21 UTC 2017
Neither stopping the primary peer (resulting in a
"communications_interrupted" state on the secondary peer) nor changing the
primary peer state to "partner_down" via OMAPI cause the secondary peer to
perform dynamic DNS updates.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Simon Hobson <dhcp1 at thehobsons.co.uk>
> Matthew Kassawara <matthew.kassawara at blinker.com> wrote:
> > If I simulate failure of the primary DHCPD instance
> Are you doing that properly, and putting the peer into partner down state ?
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dhcp-users