Secondary in failover pair does not perform dynamic DNS updates

Matthew Kassawara matthew.kassawara at
Tue Apr 4 18:29:21 UTC 2017

Neither stopping the primary peer (resulting in a
"communications_interrupted" state on the secondary peer) nor changing the
primary peer state to "partner_down" via OMAPI cause the secondary peer to
perform dynamic DNS updates.

On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Simon Hobson <dhcp1 at>

> Matthew Kassawara <matthew.kassawara at> wrote:
> > If I simulate failure of the primary DHCPD instance
> Are you doing that properly, and putting the peer into partner down state ?
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the dhcp-users mailing list