Maximum Time difference between DHCP primary and DHCP failover Server

[Thomas Markwalder]

Sorry, not enough coffee before answering emails, please disregard.

On 1/19/21 8:38 AM, kraishak wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> The primary challenge to failover performance, is that it is a synchronous
> protocol.  Servers are
> supposed to wait until their peers acknowledge that a least update has been
> received prior to sending the corresponding response (i.e. DHCPACK)to the
> client.
>
> ---> I have doubt about this topic, The dhcp failover protocol support lazy
> update right?
> server grants the leases for the client and updates the peer server after
> client lease acknowledgment, This is how it can operate even if the peer
> server is down, please correct if I am wrong
>
> -Thanks
> Kraishak
>
>   
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://isc-dhcp-users.2343191.n4.nabble.com/
> _______________________________________________
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>
> dhcp-users mailing list
> dhcp-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users