Dear Folks,
On 07/03/07 07:57 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>I grasp it as "should not be specified on the secondary"

We have it specified on the secondary, and have been having problems
with occasional resynchronisation after one of our servers has
finished re-writing its 255 *megabyte* dhcpd.leases file.

I am removing the mclt statement from the secondary, and would like to
get some idea of if the consequences of specifying it on the secondary
could include resynchronisation failures.

Also, the current version is 3.0.4, and I will upgrade to 3.0.5; does
anyone know if that helps improve resynchronisation on large systems?
-- 
Nick Urbanik http://nicku.org  x-71011 nick.urbanik@optusnet.com.au
GPG: 7FFA CDC7 5A77 0558 DC7A 790A 16DF EC5B BB9D 2C24 ID: BB9D2C24