<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFCC" text="#000000">
Glenn - you're correct.<br>
<br>
On 26/11/11 7:40, Glenn Satchell wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4ED089E1.4090705@uniq.com.au" type="cite">On
11/26/11 09:51, Jan Markus wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Dne 11/25/2011 11:17 PM, Sten Carlsen
napsal(a):
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Hmm?
<br>
<br>
fixed-address 1.1.1.2;
<br>
subnet 1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.252 {
<br>
option routers 1.1.1.1;
<br>
}
<br>
<br>
As far as I can see that fixed address IS contained in the
subnet? and
<br>
the subnet is part of the shared network?
<br>
<br>
On 25/11/11 19:58, Simon Hobson wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Sten Carlsen wrote:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">host customer101public {
<br>
hardware ethernet 00:11:22:33:44:55;
<br>
fixed-address 1.1.1.2;
<br>
}
<br>
<br>
shared-network vlan101 {
<br>
subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.248 {
<br>
option routers 10.0.0.1;
<br>
pool {
<br>
range 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.6;
<br>
deny known-clients;
<br>
}
<br>
}
<br>
<br>
subnet 1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.252 {
<br>
option routers 1.1.1.1;
<br>
}
<br>
}
<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">You still have the mistake to have a
fixed address in a range.
<br>
Declare subnet 1.1.1.0 with no range statement. There is a
risk that
<br>
an unknown client will be given the 1.1.1.2 address when
it is
<br>
defined as a range.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Err, no he hasn't. The range is in a different (RFC1918)
subnet).
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
well, I don't know what you guys know, but I've been playing
with this
<br>
configuration for a half a day, and it just plain works
<br>
<br>
but thanks for your interest anyway
<br>
<br>
-jan
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I can't see it any more either. The last posted config looks just
fine and correct.
<br>
<br>
There was an earlier one that had a range statement iin the
1.1.1.0 subnet, but you've fixed that. Looks like they're arguing
over the earlier config perhaps?
<br>
<br>
regards,
<br>
-glenn
<br>
_______________________________________________
<br>
dhcp-users mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:dhcp-users@lists.isc.org">dhcp-users@lists.isc.org</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users">https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Best regards
Sten Carlsen
No improvements come from shouting:
"MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"
</pre>
</body>
</html>