<p dir="ltr">I seem to recall there being some serious issues with peer fail-failover on 4.1.x versions. 4.2.x works well for us. [A search of the list might be helpful to confirm that my recollection is correct.]</p>
<p dir="ltr">That's not to say there isn't an issue with your config. [I didn't see anything with my weak-dhcp-foo, quick look.]<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Oct 9, 2014 1:30 PM, "Norman Elton" <<a href="mailto:normelton@gmail.com">normelton@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I should add that this is ISC DHCP 4.1.1-P1, packaged by RedHat<br>
(dhcp-4.1.1-38.P1.el6.x86_64)<br>
<br>
<br>
Norman<br>
<br>
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Norman Elton <<a href="mailto:normelton@gmail.com">normelton@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I've got two DHCP servers configured for failover:<br>
><br>
> failover peer "wm-dhcp-01-02" {<br>
> primary;<br>
> address 1.2.3.4;<br>
> port 647;<br>
> peer address 1.2.3.5;<br>
> peer port 647;<br>
> max-response-delay 30;<br>
> max-unacked-updates 10;<br>
> load balance max seconds 3;<br>
> mclt 1800;<br>
> split 128;<br>
> min-balance 60;<br>
> max-balance 300;<br>
> }<br>
><br>
> I've noticed that our DHCP log file shows helpful information when<br>
> subnets get balanced:<br>
><br>
> balancing pool 7f9da82e7960 INIT-WM-HALL total 240 free 88 backup<br>
> 96 lts -4 max-own (+/-)18<br>
><br>
> But this doesn't seem consistent. That is, there are some subnets that<br>
> balance, others never show up in the log. Presumably there's some<br>
> small difference between the two, but I can't figure it out. Here's a<br>
> subnet that is getting balanced:<br>
><br>
> group {<br>
> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;<br>
> option domain-name-servers 128.239.29.9, 128.239.20.9;<br>
> option domain-name "<a href="http://wm.edu" target="_blank">wm.edu</a>";<br>
> default-lease-time 3600; # 1 hour<br>
> max-lease-time 3600; # 1 hour<br>
><br>
> shared-network INIT-WM-HALL {<br>
> subnet 10.45.170.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {<br>
> option routers 10.45.170.1;<br>
><br>
> pool {<br>
> failover peer "wm-dhcp-01-02";<br>
> range 10.45.170.11 10.45.170.250;<br>
> }<br>
> }<br>
> }<br>
> }<br>
><br>
> And here's a seemingly similar subnet that is never showing up in the log file:<br>
><br>
> shared-network ADMIN-NET {<br>
> subnet 128.239.96.0 netmask 255.255.224.0 {<br>
> option subnet-mask 255.255.224.0;<br>
> option routers 128.239.102.1;<br>
> option domain-name-servers 128.239.29.9, 128.239.20.9;<br>
> option domain-name "<a href="http://wm.edu" target="_blank">wm.edu</a>";<br>
> deny bootp;<br>
> default-lease-time 432000; # 5 days<br>
> max-lease-time 432000; # 5 days<br>
><br>
> pool {<br>
> failover peer "wm-dhcp-01-02";<br>
> range 128.239.102.10 128.239.102.254;<br>
> }<br>
> }<br>
> }<br>
><br>
> Am I missing something? Is there some reason why the first would<br>
> rebalance and the second not?<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
> Norman Elton<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
dhcp-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:dhcp-users@lists.isc.org">dhcp-users@lists.isc.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users" target="_blank">https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div>