<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8405"><span></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8405"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_10038">both servers answer to the DHCPREQUEST offering the same IP address. </span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8405"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8405" dir="ltr"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_10039">I have a few fixed-address records, but their DNS is done manually. i do not have the </span><i id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_11081">update-static-leases</i> option specified</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8405"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8405"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_10815">The problem is encountered on 'some' addresses ... still trying to figure out which ones</span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8405"><span><br></span></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8405"><span id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_11617">During the weekend i upgraded to the 4.3.2 but i think i still observe weird behaviour </span></div> <br><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8428">Thanks</div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8428"><br></div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8428">Fred <br><br></div><div class="yahoo_quoted" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8425" style="display: block;"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8424"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8423"> <div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8427"> <font size="2" face="Arial" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8426"> Le Vendredi 4 septembre 2015 20h00, John Miller <johnmill@brandeis.edu> a écrit :<br> </font> </div> <br><br> <div class="y_msg_container" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1441607484886_8422">Both dhcp servers answering is standard procedure. Are both offering<br clear="none">the same IP address, however? That's not standard procedure.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Are you doing dns updates for hosts with fixed-address directives, by<br clear="none">any chance? (update-static-leases on)<br clear="none"><br clear="none">John<br clear="none"><div class="yqt2331213822" id="yqtfd06380"><br clear="none">On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:23 PM, gnafou <<a shape="rect" ymailto="mailto:fmgre-liste01@yahoo.fr" href="mailto:fmgre-liste01@yahoo.fr">fmgre-liste01@yahoo.fr</a>> wrote:<br clear="none">> Hello<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> I currently have isc dhcp servers working with failover and dns update (<br clear="none">> interim style )<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> When upgrading my debian machine from wheezy to jessie, it upgraded as well<br clear="none">> dhcpd from 4.2.2 to 4.3.1.<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> Since i have upgraded, i find some weird behaviour with the DNS-Update :<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> for some of the machines, both dhcp servers answer, then they both update<br clear="none">> the DNS.<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> I do not have any log lines stating ' lease owned by peer'<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> And after the lease is over, one of the dhcp server deletes the dns map<br clear="none">> though the machine is currently being served by the other server.<br clear="none"></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>