<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>On 05/04/2016 11:46 AM, lejeczek wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote cite="mid:1462362365.6964.158.camel@yahoo.co.uk"
type="cite">
<div>hi users</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I have my dhcpd to serve nothing but virbr0 (libvirt), OS is
Centos 7.2</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Depending on how ancient the systemd release is in CentOS you have,
if you dont need a full blown dhcp server like isc dhcp and are just
using a simply setup with virtualization and containers you can use
systemd networkd. <br>
<br>
systemd-networkd supports DHCP (client/server), networks with static
IP, bridges, tunnels, VLANs, Wireless (with wpa_supplicant) and you
can use it with systemd-resolved as resolver with DNS cache and
systemd timesyncd for network time synchronization. <br>
<br>
Once networkd gets a bus interface <span style="color: rgb(34, 34,
34); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Arial, sans-serif; font-size:
15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight:
normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 20px; orphans: auto;
text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none;
white-space: normal; widows: 1; word-spacing: 0px;
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float:
none;"></span>you probably will see systemd based distribution
start discussing dropping the legacy sysv initscript so you might
want to familiarize yourself with it's configuration syntax, pros
and cons and it's command line tools even if you dont need it or
want it.<br>
<br>
Here for example is a benchmarking comparison with isc dhcp [¹] for
such simple setup but if you need something more heavyweight than
simple, you should be using isc dhcp. <br>
<br>
JBG<br>
<br>
1. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://tlhp.cf/systemd-networkd-migration-and-benchmarks/">https://tlhp.cf/systemd-networkd-migration-and-benchmarks/</a><br>
</body>
</html>