<html><body><div style="font-family: Andale Mono; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000"><div style="font-family: Andale Mono; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000">Folks,</div><div style="font-family: Andale Mono; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000"><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div style="font-family: Andale Mono; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000">If any ISC employee is still monitoring this list, could we get an official confirmation that option 82 data (ie: option agent.circuit-id and option agent.remote-id) is NOT shared during the failover synchronization between failover peers and that this is by design (ie: not a bug)?<br><br><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"><div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Christian Kratzer" <ck-lists@cksoft.de><br><b>To: </b>"Users of ISC DHCP" <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Monday, July 2, 2018 11:32:20 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: Option 82 is missing from Secondry lease file incase of failover<br></blockquote></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;">Hi,<br><br>On Mon, 2 Jul 2018, perl-list wrote:<br><br>> This is still a problem. It isn't that only the primary has the option 82 information. Its actually that the issuing server (the one that sent the offer) has the option 82 information in the dhcpd.leases file. The one that did not issue and received the lease via failover synchronization DOES NOT have the option 82 stashed in the dhcpd.leases file. I have stash-agent-options true; in the config file.<br>><br><br>yes I believe I cam to the same conclusion when evaluating isc dhcp failover for a certain use case a couple of years ago.<br><br>Agent options are not replicated between failover peers.<br><br>I added agent options to the omapi lease lookups back then.<br><br>Something similar would have to be done to the lease replication for failover but I have not looked into it.<br><br>Time would propably be better spent in transitioning to KEA which also has a superior failover mode that also works for ipv6.<br><br>Greetings<br>Christian<br><br>-- <br>Christian Kratzer CK Software GmbH<br>Email: ck@cksoft.de Wildberger Weg 24/2<br>Phone: +49 7032 893 997 - 0 D-71126 Gaeufelden<br>Fax: +49 7032 893 997 - 9 HRB 245288, Amtsgericht Stuttgart<br>Mobile: +49 171 1947 843 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Kratzer<br>Web: http://www.cksoft.de/<br>_______________________________________________<br>dhcp-users mailing list<br>dhcp-users@lists.isc.org<br>https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users</blockquote></div></div><div><br></div></div></body></html>