
<html><body><div style="font-family: Andale Mono; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000"><div style="font-family: Andale Mono; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000"><div>You could do that with dynamic tho I'm not sure what the point of that would be unless you are talking DHCPv6 where failover isn't supported and addresses are plentiful.</div><br><br><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"><div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Sandra Schlichting" <littlesandra88@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"Users of ISC DHCP" <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, August 1, 2018 9:36:01 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: How to sync a Linux secondary DHCP server?<br></blockquote></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__"><blockquote style="border-left:2px solid #1010FF;margin-left:5px;padding-left:5px;color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;">> You could do that as long as there are no dynamic leases (ie: everyone has a fixed-address or similar).<br>><br>> You would want to make sure that you didn't have:<br>><br>> authoritative;<br>><br>> in the config file as that would cause the servers to NAK each other's traffic (I think it still would with fixed-address).<br><br>So if I made sure that each dhcp server served dynamic leases in<br>different ranges, so no overlap, would it then be a good setup?<br>_______________________________________________<br>dhcp-users mailing list<br>dhcp-users@lists.isc.org<br>https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users</blockquote></div></div><div><br></div></div></body></html>