why libomapi/libdhcpctl libraries are not shared objects ?
sar at isc.org
Mon Oct 27 23:44:41 UTC 2014
On Oct 27, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Do anyone know why ISC DHCP does not build shared objects for its libraries ?
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Jiri Popelka <jpopelka at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 08:46 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi All,
> I was wondering isc-dhcp does not compile libomapi/libdhcpctl/libdst
> libraries as
> shared objects (.so) instead of archives (.a).
> Are there any configuration options that would allow me to build them as
> .so ?
> None that I know of, but these patches might come in handy:
> dhcp-workers mailing list
> dhcp-workers at lists.isc.org
Mostly because we haven't determined that the need for such libraries is a high enough
priority item to be done before we do lots of other work.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dhcp-workers