why libomapi/libdhcpctl libraries are not shared objects ?

Shawn Routhier sar at isc.org
Mon Oct 27 23:44:41 UTC 2014


On Oct 27, 2014, at 12:56 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:

> Do anyone know why ISC DHCP does not build shared objects for its libraries ?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Praveen
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Jiri Popelka <jpopelka at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/13/2014 08:46 PM, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi All,
> I was wondering isc-dhcp does not compile libomapi/libdhcpctl/libdst
> libraries as
> shared objects (.so) instead of archives (.a).
> 
> Are there any configuration options that would allow me to build them as
> .so ?
> 
> None that I know of, but these patches might come in handy:
> 
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dhcp.git/plain/dhcp-remove-bind.patch
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/dhcp.git/plain/dhcp-sharedlib.patch
> 
> --
> Jiri
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Praveen
> _______________________________________________
> dhcp-workers mailing list
> dhcp-workers at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-workers

Mostly because we haven't determined that the need for such libraries is a high enough
priority item to be done before we do lots of other work.  

Shawn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/mailman/private/dhcp-workers/attachments/20141027/1e7352c2/attachment.html>


More information about the dhcp-workers mailing list