<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">bump?<br>
<br>
Op 16-10-2016 om 19:46 schreef PiBa-NL:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:4ad84692-9836-0604-8fd8-b748821cd8e3@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<p>bump? anyone?<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-forward-container">-------- Doorgestuurd bericht
--------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0"
cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Onderwerp:
</th>
<td>Fwd: [PATCH] ISC DHCP, feature, add support for IPSEC
interface, request for comment. [ISC-Bugs #43221]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Datum:
</th>
<td>Tue, 4 Oct 2016 01:16:54 +0200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Van: </th>
<td>PiBa-NL <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:PiBa.NL.dev@gmail.com"><PiBa.NL.dev@gmail.com></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Aan: </th>
<td><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:dhcp-users-request@lists.isc.org">dhcp-users-request@lists.isc.org</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<p>Hello isc dhcp-users,</p>
<p>I would like to request what is the proper way to submit a
new feature (support for enc0 ipsec interface) for ISC DHCP ?</p>
<p>I've send below mail/attachment to both dhcp-workers and
dhcp-suggest but have not yet received a reply. Is there
anything else i should do? Or what should i expect will happen
in what approximate time-frame if any can be estimated?<br>
</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>PiBa-NL<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
<br>
-------- Doorgestuurd bericht --------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0"
cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Onderwerp:
</th>
<td>[PATCH] ISC DHCP, feature, add support for IPSEC
interface, request for comment. [ISC-Bugs #43221]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Datum:
</th>
<td>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 20:11:27 +0200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Van:
</th>
<td>PiBa-NL <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
href="mailto:PiBa.NL.dev@gmail.com"><PiBa.NL.dev@gmail.com></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap="nowrap" valign="BASELINE">Aan:
</th>
<td><a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:dhcp-workers@lists.isc.org">dhcp-workers@lists.isc.org</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<pre>Hi ISC / Developers,
I hope i'm addressing the correct mail-address/list here.. Please do
tell if i should send it elsewhere.
I've added support on FreeBSD to allow for sending an DHCP-ACK message
over a 'enc0' interface in response to a DHCPINFORM request which is
used for ipsec connections.
Windows7/10 requires that subnets to be routed over the vpn connection
will be send by a dhcp option 249 as described here:
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Windows7#Split-routing-on-Windows-10-and-Windows-10-Mobile">https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/Windows7#Split-routing-on-Windows-10-and-Windows-10-Mobile</a>
I've only tested it between Windows10 and FreeBSD11rc2 sofar. But would
like to hear your opinion about this feature, is it possible to get it
merged in the next ISC-DHCP version? Or are there significant objections
against it?
Also is the implementation as done alright or what should be changed in
my implementation? Any advice / requirements / changes i should do,
please let me know.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
PiBa-NL
</pre>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>