IEPG outreach [was Re: Slides, agenda.]
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Apr 5 20:56:31 UTC 2016
> On 5 Apr 2016, at 21:27, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 06/04/2016 08:12, Chris Morrow wrote:
>> At Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:58:45 -0300,
>> Fernando Gont wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/09/2014 10:52 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>>> On 10/11/2014 13:54, manning bill wrote:
>>>>> sorry - I guess I was reading a bit more into this. if its posted via IETF, meets during IETF, why is it NOT ietf?
>>>>
>>>> Because it works better as an informal rule-free meeting?
>>>>
>>>> Do you really want it to be subject to RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879)?
>>>> I think it works better with the only relevant BCP being #38 ;-)
>>>>
>>>> (I'm all for making the agenda and slides easy to find, but that's
>>>> a separate issue.)
>>
>> is it really THAT hard to: "iepg slides" into your favorite
>> webcrawler... or iepg.org/ and get the slides from there?
>
> After the event, yes. In real time, it would be handy to have them
> on the meeting materials page. But it's not a big deal. I value the
> informality more, even if it isn't helpful when you're a few 1000km
> away, as I am this week.
I’m pretty sure I found the slides were up on the iepg site before the meeting started.
I agree on keeping it clearly separate and not subject to note well.
tim
More information about the Iepg
mailing list