Presentation suggestion for Chicago

[Ondřej Surý]

Ok, so I have a presentation proposal for IEPG - the DNS Violations 
project. I will present the weird DNS stuff in the DNS we have found so far 
and the project itself. (Please note that I have also submitted this to 
DNS-OARC and maybe RIPE 74 DNS WG, as I suspect there will be less overlap 
than usual).

Cheers,
Ondřej


On 21 February 2017 18:58:32 Warren Kumari <warren at kumari.net> wrote:

> ...  and a reminder to folk to propose presentations, etc for Chicago..?
>
>
> W
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM Chris Morrow <morrowc at ops-netman.net>
> wrote:
>
>> At Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:54:12 +0100,
>> "Giovane C. M. Moura" <giovane.moura at sidn.nl> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear chairs,
>> >
>> > We have a work that we'd like to submit for the next IEPG meeting in
>> > Chicago.
>> >
>> > The paper, currently under review, is entitled " No domain left behind:
>> > is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?"  You can find it at [1].
>> >
>> > Relevance to the IEPG audience: our paper measures in fact
>> > the efforts employed by the industry and the community to improve the
>> > adoption of encryption. We show that once costs and complexity are
>> > removed, we can pretty much have encryption adoption in bulk -- lessons
>> > that can be generalized for other security-related deployment issues.
>>
>> sounds like fun!
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > More info below:
>> >
>> > Title:  No domain left behind: is Let's Encrypt democratizing encryption?
>> > Authors: Maarten Aertsen, Maciej Korczyński, Giovane C. M. Moura,
>> > Samaneh Tajalizadehkhoob, Jan van den Berg
>> >
>> > Abstract: "
>> >     The 2013 National Security Agency revelations of pervasive
>> > monitoring have lead to an "encryption rush" across the computer and
>> > Internet industry. To push back against massive surveillance and protect
>> > users privacy, vendors, hosting and cloud providers have widely deployed
>> > encryption on their hardware, communication links, and applications. As
>> > a consequence, the most of web traffic nowadays is encrypted. However,
>> > there is still a significant part of Internet traffic that is not
>> > encrypted. It has been argued that both costs and complexity associated
>> > with obtaining and deploying X.509 certificates are major barriers for
>> > widespread encryption, since these certificates are required to
>> > established encrypted connections. To address these issues, the
>> > Electronic Frontier Foundation, Mozilla Foundation, and the University
>> > of Michigan have set up Let's Encrypt (LE), a certificate authority that
>> > provides both free X.509 certificates and software that automates the
>> > deployment of these certificates. In this paper, we investigate if LE
>> > has been successful in democratizing encryption: we analyze certificate
>> > issuance in the first year of LE and show from various perspectives that
>> > LE adoption has an upward trend and it is in fact being successful in
>> > covering the lower-cost end of the hosting market.
>> >
>> > [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03005
>> >
>> > thanks and best,
>> >
>> > /giovane
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Iepg mailing list
>> > Iepg at lists.isc.org
>> > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iepg mailing list
>> Iepg at lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
>>
>
>
>
> ----------
> _______________________________________________
> Iepg mailing list
> Iepg at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/iepg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/iepg/attachments/20170221/f5659645/attachment-0001.html>