inn compilation problem on solaris 8
kondou at nec.co.jp
Thu Mar 15 03:14:01 UTC 2001
In article <yam8473.2934.142190648 at 192.0.2.129>,
Pascal Rielland <pascal.rielland at ssti.fr> wrote;
} I replace (line 2642) by 0 (null pointer) but i don't
} really know if it's good in regards with the function
} semantic. This function is compiled with egcs 2.96
} (experimental i know but i need the 64 bits option).
That should be ok. I've corrected both STABLE
and CURRENT. Thanks.
More information about the inn-bugs