inn compilation problem on solaris 8

Katsuhiro Kondou kondou at
Thu Mar 15 03:14:01 UTC 2001

In article <yam8473.2934.142190648 at>,
	Pascal Rielland <pascal.rielland at> wrote;

} I replace (line 2642) by 0 (null pointer) but i don't
} really know if it's good in regards with the function 
} semantic. This function is compiled with egcs 2.96
} (experimental i know  but i need the 64 bits option).

That should be ok.  I've corrected both STABLE
and CURRENT.  Thanks.
Katsuhiro Kondou

More information about the inn-bugs mailing list