Actsync documentation and features

Julien ÉLIE julien at
Thu Aug 9 13:27:52 UTC 2007

> I believe there is a problem.  First of all in:
> host1_same = (double)100.0 *
>       ((double)same / (double)(same+work+host1_errs));
> same=0 so it is 0% and I cannot sync without -p 0.
> Would not it be better to have (same+ignore) / (same+ignore+work+host1_errs)?

No need to change that.  It is the right behaviour.
(Ignored lines should not be counted for the amount of changes in active.)

> And the last sum of ignored groups is bad (they are counted twice).
> I assume that enclosing it in a if(!rm_cycle) would be better.


Julien ÉLIE

« Le cerveau est un merveilleux organe. Il démarre
  au moment où vous vous levez et ne s'arrête
  qu'au moment où vous arrivez au bureau. » (Robert Frost) 

More information about the inn-bugs mailing list