Actsync documentation and features
Julien ÉLIE
julien at trigofacile.com
Thu Aug 9 13:27:52 UTC 2007
> I believe there is a problem. First of all in:
>
> host1_same = (double)100.0 *
> ((double)same / (double)(same+work+host1_errs));
>
> same=0 so it is 0% and I cannot sync without -p 0.
> Would not it be better to have (same+ignore) / (same+ignore+work+host1_errs)?
No need to change that. It is the right behaviour.
(Ignored lines should not be counted for the amount of changes in active.)
> And the last sum of ignored groups is bad (they are counted twice).
> I assume that enclosing it in a if(!rm_cycle) would be better.
Fixed.
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Le cerveau est un merveilleux organe. Il démarre
au moment où vous vous levez et ne s'arrête
qu'au moment où vous arrivez au bureau. » (Robert Frost)
More information about the inn-bugs
mailing list