[INN] #105: Reply codes other than x9x used for private extensions XBATCH and XGTITLE

INN rra at stanford.edu
Thu Dec 25 20:12:59 UTC 2008


#105: Reply codes other than x9x used for private extensions XBATCH and XGTITLE
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  iulius  |        Owner:  eagle  
     Type:  defect  |       Status:  closed 
 Priority:  low     |    Milestone:         
Component:  innd    |      Version:         
 Severity:  normal  |   Resolution:  wontfix
 Keywords:          |  
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by iulius):

  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => wontfix


Comment:

 Note that XGTITLE is properly implemented according to (alsmost obsolete)
 RFC 2980.

 Response codes are:

       481 Groups and descriptions unavailable
       282 List of groups and descriptions follows

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://inn.eyrie.org/trac/ticket/105#comment:1>
INN <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/software/inn/>
InterNetNews


More information about the inn-bugs mailing list