[INN] #105: Reply codes other than x9x used for private extensions XBATCH and XGTITLE
INN
rra at stanford.edu
Thu Dec 25 20:12:59 UTC 2008
#105: Reply codes other than x9x used for private extensions XBATCH and XGTITLE
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: iulius | Owner: eagle
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: low | Milestone:
Component: innd | Version:
Severity: normal | Resolution: wontfix
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by iulius):
* status: new => closed
* resolution: => wontfix
Comment:
Note that XGTITLE is properly implemented according to (alsmost obsolete)
RFC 2980.
Response codes are:
481 Groups and descriptions unavailable
282 List of groups and descriptions follows
--
Ticket URL: <http://inn.eyrie.org/trac/ticket/105#comment:1>
INN <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/software/inn/>
InterNetNews
More information about the inn-bugs
mailing list