nnrpd: bad xover response code
John P Speno
speno at isc.upenn.edu
Mon Aug 23 14:52:34 UTC 1999
nnrpd should use a 224 response in this case, not a 221.
*** 1.1 1999/08/23 13:43:38
--- article.c 1999/08/23 13:44:31
***************
*** 900,906 ****
OVERcount++;
gettimeofday(&stv, NULL);
if ((handle = (void *)OVopensearch(GRPcur, range.Low, range.High)) == NULL) {
! Reply("%d %s fields follow\r\n.\r\n", NNTP_HEAD_FOLLOWS_VAL, av[1]);
return;
}
if (innconf->nnrpdoverstats) {
--- 900,906 ----
OVERcount++;
gettimeofday(&stv, NULL);
if ((handle = (void *)OVopensearch(GRPcur, range.Low, range.High)) == NULL) {
! Reply("%d %s fields follow\r\n.\r\n", NNTP_OVERVIEW_FOLLOWS_VAL, av[1]);
return;
}
if (innconf->nnrpdoverstats) {
More information about the inn-patches
mailing list