Modularization of authprogs
Jeffrey M. Vinocur
jeff at litech.org
Mon Mar 5 18:07:42 UTC 2001
On 5 Mar 2001, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hm. Should we go all the way to making a libinnauth library with an
> installable man page? We could pull the code in nnrpd into that library
> as well, so that it handles both the sending and receiving side (which
> would give us flexibility to change the protocol more easily if we ever
> wanted to). Maybe that's overkill, though. (But it may make shifting
> towards long-running authentication programs easier. Hm.)
Does anyone have much of an opinion on this? I don't think it would be
complicated, and it might be a good idea. Mm. I will consider.
Indeed, that would make long-running auth easier...except we don't
actually need to modify nnrpd to do that; we'd just need to modify both
nnrpd and libauth in the future. Are we actually to the point we're
interested in doing long-running authenticators? I think it'd most
effective to pursue libinnauth simultaneously.
Is anyone else interested in working on nnrpd-related stuff?
--
Jeffrey M. Vinocur
jeff at litech.org
More information about the inn-patches
mailing list