[[ Strange - It seems the original message did not reach inn-patches, hmmm. Maybe the list doesn't like being in Cc: ? My smarthost looked satisfied with delivering both to inn-patches and inn-workers (times are CEST), but it seems it only reached inn-workers (with attachments stripped) and not inn-patches. May 26 21:47:51 mx01 postfix/smtp[15582]: 22891571AA2: to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, conn_use=18, delay=12, delays=3.1/1.9/0/6.7, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=15014-04-18, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 1AA6157146B) May 26 21:47:51 mx01 postfix/smtp[15582]: 22891571AA2: to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10024, conn_use=18, delay=12, delays=3.1/1.9/0/6.7, dsn=2.6.0, status=sent (250 2.6.0 Ok, id=15014-04-18, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 1AA6157146B) If it happens not to pass again, patches can be found at: http://linux.voyager.hr/inn/inn-2.4.4_filter_innd_new_headers.diff http://linux.voyager.hr/inn/inn-CURRENT_filter_innd_new_headers.diff ]] ---------------- original message follows below -------------------- OK, here (on inn-patches list) are the patches to extend the number of "standard" headers the filter_innd.pl/py can be used with. One is against 2.4.4, and other one against a CURRENT of 20080523. The difference is mostly just fakeinnd.c in CURRENT, which does not exist in STABLE. I've tested the 2.4.4 version and it seems to work nicely as expected. -- Opinions above are GNU-copylefted.