NNRPd "option"?
Clayton O'Neill
coneill at oneill.net
Wed Jul 14 23:41:38 UTC 1999
I seem to recall that I ripped that code out a long time ago. I'd suggest
getting a copy of lsof and seeing what is mapped and how big. Or does
FreeBSD have something similar to Solaris's pmap?
On Wed, 14 Jul 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Morning...
>
> Since upgrading to INN 2.3, my FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE machine hasn't
> been able to stay up for much more then 24hrs before grinding to a halt.
> I've been working with Matt Dillon to resolve this, and we've got it
> narrowed down to INN's 'footprint', with his suggestion being:
>
> nnrpd should not be getting that big. There is an INN configuration
> parameter, I forget exactly what it is called... which causes nnrpd to
> load the hash table for the history file into memory after a certain
> number of message-id lookups. Find it, turn it off, and recompile --
> so nnrpd *never* tries to load the hash table into memory. This may
> solve your problem simply by reducing the size of nnrpd's footprint.
>
> The thing is, I don't know of any parameter that allows, or disallows
> this, and suspect it might be something from an older one? Or I'm just
> blind? Is this an option we still have in 2.3?
>
> Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> primary: scrappy at hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
>
>
>
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list