overchan.c and malformed token messages
tjk at ams.org
Mon Oct 11 02:08:15 UTC 1999
I am using what is recommneded in the overchan(8) man page.
Here is the entry that I am currently using:
If that is wrong, then I do not know what the problems are...
Thanks for the reply.
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Katsuhiro Kondou wrote:
> In article <Pine.GSO.4.10.9910101230460.3896-100000 at sun06.ams.org>,
> Tom Kacvinsky <tjk at ams.org> wrote;
> } Anyway, what can be said about this? Where do I look in the source
> } for token generation? I looked in the innd/ subdirectory, but did
> } not find what I was looking for.
> You seem to misunderstand current overchan usage.
> See overchan(8) or sample entry in newsfeeds.
More information about the inn-workers