meowing at banet.net
Sun Oct 24 03:15:36 UTC 1999
On 23 Oct 1999, Russ Allbery wrote:
> That'd do it. I've just checked in the following patch, which should deal
> with this until we can get the inclusion of Python.h narrowed down to just
> files that don't have to be compiled with Perl include paths.
My brain hurts. Where was the conflict, with ppppppppport.h? And does it
take building both --with-perl and --with-python to make this happen?
More information about the inn-workers