Proposed samples cleanup

[Paul Tomblin]

Quoting Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu):
> Paul Tomblin <ptomblin at xcski.com> writes:
> > Quoting Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu):
> 
> >> it's probably not worth bothering moving them).  All of the
> >> configuration files are obviously still there, as are all the filter
> >> scripts.  This is stuff we really do expect people to change, plus the
> >> control message handling mess.
> 
> > Only if you make "make update" smart enough to detect that I've
> > installed cleanfeed as my filter_innd.pl, and not overwrite it.
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand.  The proposal is for the filters to remain in
> samples, with the same handling that samples has now, so they won't be
> updated with make update.

I'm an idiot, I'll freely admit.  I read that as "stuff we really DON'T expect
people to change", and therefore I thought that was the stuff that make update
*would* update.

-- 
Paul Tomblin, not speaking for anybody.
SETI at Home:  Finally a *good* way to impress Jodie Foster
http://www.setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/