rra at stanford.edu
Mon Sep 20 17:01:17 UTC 1999
Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho at ifi.uio.no> writes:
> Well, 433 is really a given, since it's in the assigned-numbers list
> from IANA. This would certainly have bit me, if I upgraded, since I run
> nnrpd out of inetd. Is that an unusual thing to do?
No, not at all. I'll add 443.
> I've seen 434, but that's assigned to something else, likewise for 120.
> Would it be worthwhile to get another number assigned?
Possibly, but note that this only applies to low-numbered ports. You can
use any high-numbered port (>1023) that you want, since the r* command
bouncing attacks can't be performed from them (they're not trusted).
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-workers