inn-2.2 / storageapi + wireformat == corruption

greg andruk meowing at
Sun Sep 26 16:36:08 UTC 1999

In nnmh:inn-workers, David W Hankins <dhankins at> wrote:

> What alternative behaviour are you suggesting?

The original QIO behavior was (mostly) correct.  To be pedantic it
should actually have been canonicalizing (is that a word?) singleton
CRs to CRLFs as well, but I do understand why that wasn't being done.

Two articles are the same if they match after applying

More information about the inn-workers mailing list