inn-2.2 / storageapi + wireformat == corruption
meowing at banet.net
Sun Sep 26 16:36:08 UTC 1999
In nnmh:inn-workers, David W Hankins <dhankins at mercenary.net> wrote:
> What alternative behaviour are you suggesting?
The original QIO behavior was (mostly) correct. To be pedantic it
should actually have been canonicalizing (is that a word?) singleton
CRs to CRLFs as well, but I do understand why that wasn't being done.
Two articles are the same if they match after applying
More information about the inn-workers