Expanded readers.conf documentation
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Thu Apr 13 00:56:01 UTC 2000
Aidan Cully <aidan at panix.com> writes:
> Thank you very, very, much for taking the time to go through the code
> and write this man page... There are a few comments I'd like to make:
Thanks! This was very helpful.
> This might be a bit misleading, since the 'radius' program I wrote is
> an 'auth:' program...
Yeah, I was very confused about what that program did. Fixed.
> I think that's also a bit false... IIRC, I wrote the code such that
> when a 'users:' keyword isn't given, it'll match auth groups that didn't
> succesfully return an auth identity, which 'users: *' doesn't do.
Ah, yes, I see that now. Fixed.
> I would prefer it if this one was written
> hosts: "*.example.com, example.com"
> because, as written, the hosts: will match fooexample.com, and others,
> instead of the probably intended example.com hosts/subdomains.
Good point. Fixed.
> You may want to get rid of the 'default: <FAIL>' line here, in case (for
> some God-forsaken reason) someone wants to have a user named <FAIL>.
> These access groups will hopefully deal with this case (though checking
> me on this would probably be a good idea):
> access full {
> users: "*"
> newsgroups: *
> }
> access fail {
> newsgroups: !*
> }
But this wouldn't work as written, correct? I think the second access
group would match all users. You have to put the fail group before the
full group for this to work.
Fixed with that change.
> I'd like to point out that, at least, the News Gizmo expects the
> username to be an e-mail address, so that it can send mail notifying
> users of some kinds of policy violations before they happen. (e.g.,
> sending more than 100 messages in a day.) I think it can be fairly
> likely that the perl filter want a valid e-mail address, and you might
> want to point this out in your doc.
I added a note on that.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the inn-workers
mailing list